2
“Where Is the One Who Was Born to Be King of the Jews?”
After Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea during the time+ of King Herod, there+ came to Jerusalem, from the east, some men who studied the stars.+ “Where is the one who was born to be+ king of the Jews?” they asked. “We observed his star when it rose and have come to worship him.”
When King Herod heard this, he was alarmed, and all the people+ of Jerusalem along with him. So after he gathered all the chief priests and Torah-experts+ in leadership over+ the people, he kept asking+ them about where the Messiah was to be born.
“In Bethlehem of Judea,” they said to him. “For this is what+ has been written through the prophet:
“ ‘And ˢyou, Bethlehem, region of Judah,+
are among the leading cities+ of Judah by no means least!+
For out of you will come a ruler,
who will shepherd my people Israel.’ ”+
Herod, then, having summoned the visitors from the east+ secretly,+ learned from them the exact time the star had appeared.+ And as he sent them to Bethlehem, he said, “Go and make a careful search for the child. When ᵖyou find him, report back to me, so that I myself+ may go and worship him, too.”
After listening to the king, the men+ went on their way. Then something remarkable happened:+ The star, whose rising they had observed,+ was moving ahead of them, until it came and stopped above the place where the child was! 10 When the men+ saw the star, they were overcome with joy.+ 11 On coming into the house, they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they threw themselves to the ground and worshiped him. Then they opened their treasures and presented him with gifts; that is, with gold and frankincense and myrrh. 12 And because+ they had been divinely warned in a dream not to go back to Herod, it was+ by an alternative route that they left for their own country.
“It Was Egypt out of Which I Called My Son”
13 Now after the men+ had left, suddenly there+ appeared to Joseph in a dream an angel+ of the Lord. “Get up,” the angel+ said, “take the child and his mother and flee to Egypt and stay there until I tell ˢyou, because Herod is about to order+ a search for the child, to have+ him killed.” 14 So Joseph+ got up and took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, 15 and he stayed there until Herod died.+ And so was fulfilled, according to plan,+ what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet: “It was+ Egypt out of which I called my son.”+
“It’s Rachel, Weeping for Her Children”
16 Herod, then, on realizing that he had been outwitted by the visitors from the east, was absolutely furious. He sent some soldiers+ and ordered+ them to execute all the young boys in Bethlehem and throughout the surrounding areas who were two years old and under, according to the exact time he had learned from the visitors. 17 Then what was spoken through Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled:
18 “There+ was heard a sound in the city+ of Ramah,
sobbing and intense wailing;
it’s+ Rachel, weeping for her children!
And she refused to be consoled, because they are dead.++
“He Would Be Called This: ‘Netzer,’ The Branch”
19 Now after Herod died, suddenly there+ appeared to Joseph in a dream, while he was in Egypt,+ an angel+ of the Lord. 20 “Get up,” the angel+ said, “take the child and his mother and go back+ to the land of Israel. For those who were trying to kill the child are dead.” 21 So Joseph+ got up and took the child and his mother and entered the land of Israel. 22 When he heard, though, that Archelaus was the one+ now ruling+ over+ Judea in succession+ to his father Herod, he was afraid to go there.+ So, having been divinely warned in a dream, Joseph+ left for the district of Galilee. 23 He went and settled in a town called Natzar-eth. And so was fulfilled, right in line with God’s plan,+ what had been spoken through the prophets, namely, that he would be called this:+ “Netzer,” the Branch.+
+1:1Though anarthrous (ie, no definite article is present), the noun here is definite. It most likely lacks the article because it is being introduced for the first time in the discourse. Cf also Apollonius’ Corollary (as described, eg, in Wallace, Grammar, 239-40, 250-51; cf also NET Bible Notes, Mt 1:1).+1:1Lit the record of the genealogy. ME (see NAC [Mt], 52; UBSHS [Mt], 8; Richards, BR Companion, 602). Here, Matthew has not only Jesus’ genealogy, but also the account of his birth, in view. Cf Gn 5:1.+1:2Cf LEB.+1:3Lit Judah fathered Perez and Zerah by Tamar. ME. Cf CJB, NIV, NLT, TEV.+1:5Lit Salmon fathered Boaz by Rahab. ME. Cf CJB, NIV, NLT, TEV.+1:5Lit Boaz fathered Obed by Ruth. ME. Cf CJB, NIV, NLT, TEV.+1:6Lit David fathered Solomon by she/the woman of Uriah. Following the lead of the UBSHS in translation here (see UBSHS [Mt], 14). Cf ASV, NASB, NIV, NKJV, NLT, YLT.+1:18οὕτως ( houtōs) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore a demonstrative cleft has been used to give extra focus to this element, which points forward to the story that follows. Cf CJB, NCV, NIV, NLT, TEV.+1:18IT. The whole narrative is in view (see UBSHS [Mt], 22).+1:18Lit was betrothed. ME(H) (see L-N, 34.74; NAC (Mt), 57; UBSHS (Mt), 20; ISV footnote at Mt 1:18).+1:18Lit before they came together. ME(I/F) (see BDAG, 970, sv συνέρχομαι 3; L-N, 23.61; M-M, 606).+1:18IT. “Power” is implied here and is made explicit in the translation to avoid sexual connotations (see UBSHS [Mt], 21). Cf NCV, NLT. Cf also Lk 1:35.+1:18ἐν γαστρὶ ( en gastri) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and has therefore been placed in clause-final to give extra focus to this element within the ME (see following note).+1:18Lit she was discovered to be having in the womb. ME(I/F) (see L-N, 23.50). Cf ESV, NET, NLT, NRSV, RSV, YLT at Mt 1:23.+1:19δίκαιος ( dikaios) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore italics have been used to give this element extra focus and emphasis.+1:19Throughout the Blessed Hope Translation, if a word or phrase is italicized, it means that it is being emphasized in the Greek text.+1:19Or although Joseph her husband was a righteous man. For further discussion of the interpretation represented in the text, see UBSHS [Mt], 22; Robertson, Word Pictures, Mt 1:19. Cf NABRE.+1:19Lit her.+1:19δειγματίσαι ( deigmatisai) is in an embedded DFE position (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore part of this element has been placed in clause-final for primary focus within the comment.+1:19λάθρᾳ ( lathra) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and has thus been placed in clause-final for primary focus and stress.+1:20ἐνθυμηθέντος ( enthumēthentos) is an DFE position, with ταῦτα ( tauta) functioning as a thematically prominent topic (see BART Display), and therefore inversion has been used in translation to keep the POD at the beginning of the sentence, and to give extra focus to both the topic and the verb.+1:20κατʼ ὄναρ ( katʼ onar) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore commas have been used to give extra focus to this element.+1:20ἄγγελος κυρίου ( angelos kuriou) is in P2 (see BART Display), and therefore a dummy subject has been used to give this constituent extra focus (by allowing it to fall in clause-final, out of its default order in English).+1:20Angel here is receiving focal prominence, which would explain the lack of the article.+1:20Or the angel. For a discussion about “an angel” versus “the angel,” see NET Bible Notes, Mt 1:20.+1:20πνεύματός ἁγίου ( pneumatos hagiou) is in a split focal position (see BART Display and LDGNT), and thus a cleft-construction has been used to give extra focus to this constituent. Cf TEV.+1:20IT. See note at Mt 1:18 above.+1:20Lit that which has been in her conceived is by the Holy Spirit. ME. Cf TEV.+1:21Throughout the Blessed Hope Translation, if a second person pronoun is marked with a superscripted “s” (ˢyou), it means that the pronoun is singular. If a second person pronoun is marked with a superscripted “p” (ᵖyou), it means that the pronoun is plural. In cases where the singularity or plurality of a second person pronoun has been deemed to be sufficiently clear from the context, the second person pronoun may not be marked.+1:21This is an imperatival future. Cf HCSB, ISV, NIV, NLT, NRSV.+1:21ME(OTB)/IT. In Hebrew, Jesus’ name is Yeshua, which means “Yahweh saves” (see, eg, the HCSB footnote; NET Bible Notes, Mt 1:20). Information flow is built on the IT here, and therefore the IT has been made explicit in translation.+1:22The context (citation of prophet, with God’s prophetic plan in view) indicates that the subordinate ἵνα ( hina) clause here should be understood as communicating both purpose and result (for more on purpose/result ἵνα clauses, see BDAG, 477, sv ἵνα 3; Wallace, Grammar, 473-4). The phrase “according to plan” (cf BDAG, 477) is drawn from the purpose-result ἵνα clause ( BDAG uses ἵνα πληρωθῇ [ hina plērothē] in Mt as a specific example of a purpose/result ἵνα clause).+1:23Lit the woman will have in the womb. ME(I/F) (see L-N, 23.50). Cf ESV, NET, NLT, NRSV, RSV, YLT. ἐν γαστρὶ ( en gastri) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore this element has been italicized for extra focus and emphasis.+1:25Lit was not knowing her, or did not begin to know her. ME(I/F) (see L-N, 23.61). Cf most English translations.+2:1Lit days. ME. Cf CJB, NCV, NIV, NLT, TEV.+2:1μάγοι ἀπὸ ἀνατολῶν ( magoi apo anatolōn) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore this element within the ME (see following note) been placed in clause-final for extra focus and stress (with the help of a dummy subject). Commas have also been used to the same end. For more on the effects created by this type of structuring in English, see LGSWE, 399-400.+2:1Lit Magi. ME(H) (see BDAG, 608, sv μάγος 1; ESL, #3097; L-N, 62.40). Cf TEV.+2:2IT (see UBSHS [Mt], 33). Cf NCV, TEV.+2:3IT. Cf CJB, ISV, TEV.+2:4Traditionally “scribes.” ME(H) (see NET Bible Notes, Mt 2:4; UBSHS [Mt], 35). Cf NET.+2:4The genitive here has been interpreted as a genitive of subordination. This is reflected in the translation.+2:4Or questioned them one after another. VPR. See VCC (Mt 2:4).+2:5οὕτως ( houtōs) is forward-pointing and is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore a demonstrative wh-cleft has been used to give extra focus to this element (for more on the function of demonstrative wh-clefts in English, see LSGSWE, 421). Cf HCSB, ISV, NASB, NIV, NLT, TEV.+2:6Here there are two vocatives in apposition. Cf ASV, LEB, NASB, YLT.+2:6Lit rulers/leaders/governors. ME(I/F) (see L-N, 37.59). Cf NCV, NLT, TEV.+2:6οὐδαμῶς ἐλαχίστη ( oudamōs elachistē) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and has therefore been placed in clause-final for primary focus and stress.+2:6Mic 5:2+2:7Lit Magi. So throughout this section. See note at Mt 2:1.+2:7λάθρᾳ ( lathra) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and has therefore been placed at the end of the clause for primary focus and stress.+2:7Lit the time of the shining/appearing star.+2:8κἀγὼ is in P2 (see BART Display), and thus an intensive pronoun has been used to extra focus to this constituent.+2:9Lit they.+2:9Lit behold. EFE. In Greek, ἰδοὺ ( idou) is a forward-pointing device that lets the reader know that something significant, surprising, or important is about to take place (see Runge, Disc Grammar, 122; LDGNT Intro, 1.4).+2:9Lit the star they had observed when it rose.+2:10Lit they.+2:10Lit they rejoiced exceedingly with great joy. ME. Cf CJB, HCSB, ISV, NET, NIV, NLT, TEV.+2:12The participle here has been interpreted as an adverbial participle of cause. This is reflected in the translation. Cf NLT, TEV.+2:12διʼ ἄλλης ὁδοῦ ( diʼ allēs ‘odou) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore a cleft-construction has been used to extra focus and stress to this element.+2:13Lit they.+2:13ἄγγελος κυρίου ( angelos kuriou) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore a dummy subject has been used to give this constituent extra focus (by allowing it to fall in clause-final, out of its default order in English).+2:13Or the angel. See note at Mt 1:20.+2:13Lit he.+2:13The verb here is functioning causatively/ergatively. For more on causative/ergative actives (in which the subject is the ultimate source behind the action), see Wallace, Grammar, 411.+2:13The verb here is functioning causatively/ergatively. For more on causative/ergative actives (in which the subject is the ultimate source behind the action), see Wallace, Grammar, 411.+2:14Lit he.+2:15The genitive here is a subjective genitive. Cf NET, NCV, TEV.+2:15“According to plan” is drawn from the purpose-result ἵνα ( hina) clause. See note at Mt 1:22.+2:15ἐξ Αἰγύπτου ( ex Aiguptou) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore a cleft-construction has been used to give this element extra focus and emphasis.+2:15Ho 11:1+2:16IT. The direct object is implied here contextually (see UBSHS [Mt], 49). In Greek, direct objects are often omitted when clear from the context (see, eg, NET Bible Notes, Re 3:7). Cf NET.+2:16The verb here is functioning causatively/ergatively. For more on causative/ergative actives (in which the subject is the ultimate source behind the action), see Wallace, Grammar, 411. Cf ISV.+2:18φωνὴ ἐν Ῥαμὰ κλαυθμὸς καὶ ὀδυρμὸς πολύς ( phōnē en Rama klauthmos kai odurmos polus) is in a split focal position (see BART Display; cf LDGNT), and therefore a dummy subject and comma have been used to give extra focus to this element.+2:18IT (see L-N, 93.558).+2:18Ῥαχὴλ ( Rachēl) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and thus the clause has been rendered so as to give extra focus to this element.+2:18Lit because they are not. ME. Cf NLT, TEV.+2:18Jr 31:15+2:19ἄγγελος κυρίου ( angelos kuriou) is in P2 (see BART Display), and therefore a dummy-subject has been used to give extra focus to this element. ἐν Αἰγύπτῳ ( en Aiguptō) has also been used as a spacer to the same end.+2:19Lit in Egypt. Cf NCV.+2:19Or the angel. See note at Mt 1:20.+2:20Lit it/he.+2:20IT. Cf NLT, TEV.+2:21Lit he.+2:22Ἀρχέλαος ( Archelaos) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore the clause has been structured to give this element extra focus.+2:22Here the present indicative is being used to express relative time from point of view of the original speaker (see BDF, §324).+2:22This is a genitive of subordination. Cf most English translations.+2:22Lit in place of. ME. Cf CJB, TEV.+2:22ἐκεῖ ( ekei) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and has thus been italicized for extra focus and emphasis.+2:22Lit he.+2:23“Right in line with God’s plan” is drawn from the purpose/result ἵνα ( hina) clause, to go with “and so,” which signals result. See note at Mt 1:22.+2:23Ναζωραῖος ( Nazōraios) is in P2 (see BART Display and LDGNT), and therefore a colon and demonstrative pronoun have been used to give extra focus to this element.+2:23Lit a Nazarene. ME(OTB)/IT. Netzer is one of the Hebrew words for sprout, shoot, or branch (eg Is 11:1; see HCBC, 404-5; Vincent, Word Studies, 22.). Here Matthew is using a play on words to summarize the collective testimony of several prophets, namely, that the Messiah would be called the “Branch of the Lord” (cf Is 4:2, 11:1; Jr 23:5, 33:15; Zc 3:8, 6:12).